Close
New

Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.

 

Child Sexual Abuse Clinical Presentation

  • Author: Angelo P Giardino, MD, MPH, PhD; Chief Editor: Caroly Pataki, MD  more...
 
Updated: Jun 09, 2016
 

History

In incidents of child sexual abuse (CSA), the interview with the child is typically the most valuable component of the medical evaluation. Elicited history is frequently the only diagnostic information that is uncovered. Additionally, if performed in a sensitive and knowledgeable manner, the history-taking process can be a first step in the healing process for the child who is sexually traumatized. Regardless of the history provided, the members of the interdisciplinary team need to demonstrate an open, nonjudgmental, and caring attitude toward the child; the willingness to advocate for the child must be demonstrated as the evaluation unfolds.

  • General principles for successful history taking
    • To assist in creating a comfortable and nonthreatening environment, allow an extended period of time when taking the history in children who are suspected of being sexually abused.
    • When interviewing the child, use a developmentally sensitive approach to the questioning so that the child can understand what is being asked and is able to answer as accurately as possible.
    • Rely on nonleading questions as much as possible to permit the child to relate information in a credible and reliable framework.
    • An interview often has a healing value for children, enabling them to start to feel some control with what occurs in their lives in contrast to the abusive situation that took away the control they should have with their own bodies.
    • In an effort to demystify the information-gathering process, consider permitting children to sit where they want to sit, slowing down the pace of the interview if it starts to go too fast, permitting time for play breaks, and encouraging children to use their own words for body parts.
  • Initial introduction with efforts to build up trust
    • During the initial meeting, the health care provider and any members of the interdisciplinary team who are involved with the treatment of the child should introduce themselves to the child and caregiver.
    • At this point, the primary health care provider should explain how the evaluation usually proceeds, including the need to first speak alone with the caregiver and then alone with the child.
    • After these initial conversations, ask the caregiver to rejoin the child for a physical examination, which frequently is understood as a "check-up" by the child.
  • Caregiver interview
    • Ensure that caregivers who accompany children have an opportunity to describe their concerns, provide information about the children's health, and outline any information they have related to the suspected abuse.
    • By interviewing the caregiver first, the interviewer allows the child an extra bit of time to become familiarized with the clinical setting and, hopefully, to become more comfortable with the environment.
    • Initially explain to the caregiver the extent to which the information elicited during the interview is required to be shared with child protective services (CPS) staff and law enforcement personnel who may be involved with the case.
    • Clarifying the limits of confidentially in suspected incidents of child sexual abuse is paramount to avoid feelings of betrayal later if and when information is shared with the various involved agencies.
  • Child interview
    • When verbal children are interviewed when the caregivers are not present, children may not provide the most valuable information.
    • Using a sensitive approach and building on what has been learned in the warm-up and caregiver interview components, begin with nonthreatening topics such as favorite activities, school subjects, and personal interests.
    • Once rapport has been established in the interview, ask the children why they have come to the doctor's office.
    • By focusing on asking simply worded, open-ended, nonleading questions, the person taking the history can progress through the standard "what, when, where, and how" questions, which are important to the medical evaluation of suspected child sexual abuse.
    • The full potential of the interview can be realized by a reliance on such questioning as "tell me more" followed by "and then what happened?"
    • Supporting the child for working hard to answer the questions (but not for the content of the answers) is vital to the credibility of the information elicited.
    • The clinician must understand the developmental capacity of the child and work within the child's abilities to garner the information needed. Thus, children may not know dates but they remember holidays; children may remember something happened before or after school began.
    • Asking children to explain what they mean to avoid misunderstanding important points in the history is always appropriate.
    • Using the child's words for body parts may make the child more comfortable with difficult conversations about sexual activities.
    • Using drawings may also help children describe where they may have been touched and with what they were touched.
    • Meticulous documentation is a necessity for these types of histories, because the documentation may be considered as evidence in subsequent legal proceedings emanating from the overall investigation.
    • To the extent possible, document specific quotes that the child makes about the abusive events.
    • Often, entries made in medical charts by health care providers of children's words detailing their own sexual victimization assist those advocating for children as they argue for suitable protection from people and situations that may be threats to the children's well-being.
    • Consider videotaping or audiotaping the interview if the jurisdiction permits this.
  • Wrap-up and preparation for the physical examination
    • After the child interview concludes, the caregiver can be invited back in the room to help facilitate the transition to the physical examination.
    • Being honest and empathetic with the child is critically important.
    • Therefore, do not promise that needles are not to be used unless absolutely sure that obtaining blood is not necessary; if not sure, reassure children that blood is obtained only if needed and, if blood is needed, children are told at the end of the examination.
    • Inform children if genital swabs are to be collected; allow them to handle the swabs in order to gain some comfort with the procedure.
    • If a colposcope is to be used during the physical examination, introduce it as a "special camera" that the doctor uses that does not touch the child.
    • After an appropriate discussion, leave the room and allow the child to prepare for the examination by suitable disrobing and putting on a gown with the caregiver's assistance.
Next

Physical

As opposed to adult sexual abuse and in general, authorities agree that more than three fourths of physical examinations of children suspected of having been sexually abused are without definitive findings of sexual abuse. Heger and colleagues conducted a comprehensive study that included the review of physical examinations performed on 2,384 children evaluated for suspected child sexual abuse in a regional referral.[19] They found that, overall, only 4% of the children had abnormal findings. Of 182 children specifically referred for evaluation of a suspected finding identified by a health care provider, the child abuse specialist only found 8% of these children with a finding (this is the group expected to have the highest likelihood of a finding on examination due to the initial concern from the referring health care provider).

Additionally, of children who reported either vaginal or anal penetration, only 5.5% had physical examination findings. Thus, Heger and colleagues concluded that the vast majority of suspected child sexual abuse physical examinations are likely to not discover physical findings (what are commonly referred to as "normal" physical examination findings). Numerous reasons are believed to account for this general lack of findings. First, the child and family typically know the perpetrators, and physical force is not often a major component as in adult sexual assaults. Disclosure of the abuse frequently is delayed, and evaluations may be performed weeks to months after the abusive contact. Finally, mucous membranes that compose the genital structures heal rapidly and, often, without obvious scarring. See the imags below.

Girl in frog-leg supine position, exhibiting annul Girl in frog-leg supine position, exhibiting annular hymenal orifice. Tissue is thin and translucent without disruption or scarring. Courtesy of Carol D. Berkowitz, MD.
Girl in frog-leg supine position exhibiting hymena Girl in frog-leg supine position exhibiting hymenal orifice, which is crescentic and has symmetric attenuation at lateral margins. No scarring is present. Courtesy of Carol D. Berkowitz, MD.

The general approach to the physical examination follows the standard examination techniques for a comprehensive physical examination (ie, complete head-to-toe approach). When examining the child who is suspected of being sexually abused, place particular emphasis on the genital and anal examination; however, children should experience this more thorough inspection of their anogenital anatomy only in the context of a complete examination. In this way, children receive messages that their whole bodies and health are important; this helps to avoid any undue focus on their anogenital areas.

  • Examining genital and perianal structures: To perform a complete examination of the child's genitalia and perianal structures for abnormalities attributed to abuse, the examiner first must understand the basic anatomy of this body area. Initially considering the female prepubertal genitalia with minimal palpation, externally inspect the vulvar structures. Tissues of interest are mons pubis, labia majora, labia minora, clitoris, urethral meatus, hymen, fossa navicularis, and posterior fourchette. The postpubertal child may require a more extensive examination requiring internal examination of the vagina and cervix, depending on the suspected type of contact. This section focuses on the external examination of the prepubertal female genitalia. Child Abuse and Neglect: Physical Abuse includes a detailed description of the examination of the female adolescent patient. Structure descriptions are as follows:
    • Mons pubis
      • This genital structure is the skin-covered mound of fatty tissue above the pubic symphysis.
      • Due to maternal estrogen effect, the neonate's mons pubis appears generous and rounded; however, as the estrogen effect decreases, the roundness is lost until the child's endogenous estrogen level increases at the time of puberty.
      • In response to circulating hormones, the mons pubis is the site for pubic hair growth during pubertal development and adulthood.
    • Labia majora
      • These bilateral skin-covered longitudinal folds of fatty and connective tissue serve as external protection for the more recessed vulvar structures.
      • The neonate's labia majora are thicker due to maternal estrogen effect, and this decreases over time.
      • The child's labia majora do not completely cover the internal structures.
      • During puberty, pubic hair grows on the skin covering the labia majora as well.
    • Labia minora
      • These bilateral, thin, mucous membrane longitudinal folds are observed medial and more recessed in relation to the skin-covered labia majora.
      • Because of maternal estrogen, the neonate's labia minora are frequently larger than expected and may protrude beyond the labia majora; however, this decreases over time.
      • Anteriorly, the labia divide into lateral and medial components, with the lateral labial component fusing centrally to form the prepuce of the clitoris.
      • The medial labial components fuse to form the clitoral frenulum.
      • Posteriorly, the labia fuse to form the posterior fourchette.
      • No hair grows on the labia minora.
    • Clitoris
      • The clitoris is the small, cylindrical, erectile structure composed of a prepuce, frenulum, glans, and body.
      • Similar to the other structures described above, the maternal estrogen effect causes a transient enlargement of this structure, which decreases over weeks to months after birth.
    • Urethral meatus
      • This genital structure is the round outlet of the urinary system inferior to the clitoris.
      • This outlet may be difficult to routinely visualize in the child, but urethral tissue occasionally may prolapse, creating a beefy red donut-shaped protrusion at the site of the meatus.
    • Hymen
      • The hymen is the mucous membrane sheetlike structure that has an opening and is situated at the entrance to the vagina, sitting in a recessed fashion between the medial aspects of labia minora. See the images below.
        Girl in frog-leg supine position exhibiting hymen. Girl in frog-leg supine position exhibiting hymen. Hymen is septate; a band of tissue crosses the hymenal orifice. Tissue is thin with no scarring present. Courtesy of Carol D. Berkowitz, MD.
        Infant girl with imperforate hymen and absence of Infant girl with imperforate hymen and absence of a hymenal orifice. Courtesy of Carol D. Berkowitz, MD.
      • Hymenal tissue is very sensitive to estrogen, and the estrogenized hymen is pink and opaque compared to the relatively unestrogenized hymenal tissue, which generally is thin, translucent, and reddish with an obvious lacy vascular pattern. See the images below.
        Adolescent girl in supine position demonstrating e Adolescent girl in supine position demonstrating estrogenized tissue. Hymen is thicker, pink, and fairly opaque with no vessels visible. Tissue is redundant. Courtesy of Carol D. Berkowitz, MD.
        Genital examination of adolescent girl revealing e Genital examination of adolescent girl revealing estrogenized hymenal tissue that is pink, thick, and opaque. Orifice appears irregular, secondary to significant redundancy of tissue. Courtesy of Carol D. Berkowitz, MD.
        Genital examination of adolescent girl demonstrati Genital examination of adolescent girl demonstrating estrogenized hymenal tissue that is pink, thick, and opaque. Orifice is irregular due to areas of redundancy, especially at the 9-o'clock position. Courtesy of Carol D. Berkowitz, MD.
      • The shape of the hymenal orifice varies, and the various shapes are generally described as crescentic (half-moon), annular (circular), fimbriated (redundant tissue that folds over on itself like excess ribbon around an opening), septate (column of tissue that crosses the opening), and cribriform (series of small openings). See the images below.
        Infant girl in frog-leg supine position. Hymenal o Infant girl in frog-leg supine position. Hymenal orifice is crescentic (little time is present at 12-o'clock posterior). Hymen is thin and translucent with vessels visible. Hymenal edge is regular and without interruption. Courtesy of Carol D. Berkowitz, MD.
        Girl in knee-chest position. Hymenal orifice is cr Girl in knee-chest position. Hymenal orifice is crescentic, thin, translucent, and without interruption or scarring. Courtesy of Carol D. Berkowitz, MD.
        Infant girl in frog-leg supine position. Hymenal o Infant girl in frog-leg supine position. Hymenal orifice is annular, with tissue present around entire opening. Some redundancy is present. Courtesy of Carol D. Berkowitz, MD.
        Infant girl in frog-leg supine position. Genital e Infant girl in frog-leg supine position. Genital examination reveals translucent hymenal membrane with significant redundant tissue making hymenal orifice difficult to appreciate in this photo. With further traction applied to both labia majora, the hymenal orifice could be observed. Courtesy of Carol D. Berkowitz, MD.
      • The shape of the orifice can be further described by the appearance of clefts, bumps, notches, tags, and the presence of thickening or thinning at the orifice's edge. See the image below.
        Infant girl in frog-leg supine position. Hymenal o Infant girl in frog-leg supine position. Hymenal orifice is annular with a "bump" at 1-o'clock position and a small "notch" at 10-o'clock position. Hymenal membrane is thin and translucent, with no interruption or scarring. Courtesy of Carol D. Berkowitz, MD.
      • The observed size of the hymenal orifice varies, depending on the state of relaxation of the child, the position of the child, and examiner technique.
      • As such, most authorities agree that measurement of the hymenal orifice has limited utility in the evaluation.
    • Posterior fourchette: Formed by the posterior meeting of the labia minora, the posterior fourchette is the floor of the fossa navicularis.
    • Fossa navicularis: The fossa navicularis is the space bounded by the posterior fourchette and the point where the hymen attaches to the inferior aspect of the vaginal wall at its entrance.
  • Standard positioning: To expose the prepubertal genital structures as fully as possible, several standard positions are used, namely frog-leg supine, knee-chest, and the left lateral decubitus.
    • Frog-leg supine position
      • This position is ideal for optimal visualization of the genital structures and for a fair degree of comfort for the child.
      • The child lays supine on the examining table or on the caregiver's lap and flexes her knees, bringing the heels of her feet together while abducting her hips; thus, her legs can move laterally, providing an excellent view of the external genitalia.
    • Knee-chest position
      • The knee-chest position provides clear observation of the anus; it also offers an opportunity to examine the vulvar structures, including the hymen, from a different vantage point.
      • This position can be helpful in assessing a difficult-to-visualize hymenal orifice.
      • As the child kneels down, resting her chest against her knees on the examination table and moving her buttocks superiorly, the anterior abdominal wall falls forward, and the hymenal tissues may be extended somewhat more than in the frog-leg supine position.
      • The main disadvantage to this position is that children may feel vulnerable and are often uncomfortable remaining in this position.
    • Left lateral decubitus
      • This alternative position is most appropriate for anal examination and most commonly is used with boys.
      • The left lateral decubitus position does not offer a clear visualization of the female vulvar structures.
      • The child lies on his left side with knees flexed and buttocks placed toward the examining table's edge and the examiner.
  • Calming the child during examination: In addition to positioning, make efforts to keep the child engaged and calm during the examination. Often, calming the child is accomplished by talking to the child and explaining what to expect during the examination. Additionally, proper attention to modesty is necessary, and the use of a quiet room, with adequate privacy, is essential. Use gowns and drapes as appropriate.
  • Genital and anal examination: Examiners may find it helpful to progress through the genital and anal examination in a fairly routine sequence, during both the actual examination and the subsequent documentation.
    • General observation and inspection
      • The genital examination begins with general observation and inspection.
      • With the child in the appropriate position and with adequate light and privacy, look for signs of injury on the skin surfaces, make a judgment about the presence and character of pubic hair for sexual maturity rating purposes, and look for any obvious signs of infections.
      • Note the child's emotional status.
    • Visualizing the more recessed genital structures
      • Once the inspection is completed with gloved hands, the examiner may use gentle palpation to move the tissues and further visualize the more recessed genital structures.
      • By applying gentle lateral traction to the labia majora, the labia minora and hymen may be observed more clearly.
      • Magnification, provided by a hand-held magnifying glass or colposcope, may be helpful during the genital examination. The colposcope has the advantage of providing an excellent light source and having the capability to take photographs during the examination.
      • Internal examinations and the use of instruments are almost never necessary in the prepubertal examination for suspected child sexual abuse.
      • If deemed necessary because of a serious finding (eg, bleeding with no identified source), arrange an examination under anesthesia.
    • Collection of specimens
      • At this point in the examination, specimens may be collected for STD screening and forensic evidence collection.
      • These procedures are described in more detail in the Workup section.
    • Possible observable findings: Most individuals who have been sexually abused present with essentially normal examination findings. However, possible observable findings include (1) those attributable to acute injury if the examination is performed a relatively short time after the sexual contact or (2) chronic findings that may be residual effects following repeated episodes of genital contact, which have occurred over an extended period of time.
      • Examples of acute trauma include subtle erythema, abrasions, lacerations, friability, bleeding, and disruption of the hymen. Additionally, if the perpetrator ejaculated on or near the child's genitalia, seminal products may be found. Signs related to the existence of STDs may also be present. These signs may include vaginal discharge, signs of vulvovaginitis, and characteristic lesions, such as the viral lesions observed in genital herpes and the warts observed with human papilloma virus infection (ie, condyloma acuminata). See the images below.
        Genital examination of girl revealing bruising on Genital examination of girl revealing bruising on medial aspects of labia minora, hymenal trauma with disruption of hymenal tissue, and fresh blood. Courtesy of Carol D. Berkowitz, MD.
        Infant girl with significant bruising that involve Infant girl with significant bruising that involved labia minora and labia majora, hymenal trauma with disruption of hymen, and fresh blood. Courtesy of Carol D. Berkowitz, MD.
        Genital examination 10 days after infant girl pres Genital examination 10 days after infant girl presented with significant bruising that involved labia minora and labia majora, hymenal trauma with disruption of hymen, and fresh blood. Bruising on vulvar structure is nearly resolved. Hymen is healing and no blood is observed. Courtesy of Carol D. Berkowitz, MD.
      • Chronic findings that may be found include scars on the genital skin and mucous membranes, remodeled hymenal tissue from repeated trauma, and disrupted vascular patterns in the translucent tissues. Healing occurs in these tissues. Over months to years of abusive contact, angular margins in hymenal tissue tend to smooth out, and, with the onset of puberty, the appearance of estrogen and resultant hypertrophy of the genital mucous membranes tend to obscure subtle changes.
  • Muram diagnostic categorization system: From a historical perspective, the Muram categorization system is of note and offers valuable insight into how various prepubertal genital examination findings may assist diagnosis.
    • Category I - Genitalia with no observable abnormalities
    • Category II - Nonspecific findings that are minimally suggestive of sexual abuse but also may be caused by other etiologies
    • Category III - Strongly suggestive findings that have a high likelihood of being caused by sexual abuse
    • Category IV - Definitive findings that have no possible cause other then sexual contact (eg, seminal products in a prepubertal female child's vagina, the presence of a nonvertically transmitted gonorrhea or syphilis infection)
  • Alternate classification
    • Adams and colleagues have built upon the Muram classification approach and have combined it with information from other components of the sexual abuse assessment.[1] These clinical investigators propose an approach to the interpretation of medical findings in suspected child sexual abuse that offers a sound basis from which the examining health care provider can a differential diagnosis and offer a diagnostic impression at the conclusion of the health care evaluation. According to the 2008 update, Adams and colleagues propose an approach that has the following 8 categories of findings:[2]
      • Findings documented in newborns or commonly seen in nonabused children (ie, normal variants)
      • Findings commonly caused by other medical conditions
      • Indeterminate findings (ie, insufficient/conflicting research data so requires caution in interpretation)
      • Findings diagnostic of trauma and/or sexual contact
      • Residual/healing injuries
      • Injuries of blunt force penetrating trauma
      • Presence of infection that confirms mucosal contact with infected bodily secretions (ie, contact most likely to have been sexual)
      • Diagnostic of sexual contact (ie, pregnancy or sperm directly taken from a child's body)
    • Because of the complexity of evaluation and the expertise required to accurately identify and interpret examination findings, Adams et al conclude their 2008 update with a call for standardization of the training of medical professionals who perform suspected child sexual abuse evaluations to ensure appropriate and continuing competence.
Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Angelo P Giardino, MD, MPH, PhD Professor and Section Head, Academic General Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine; Senior Vice President and Chief Quality Officer, Texas Children’s Hospital

Angelo P Giardino, MD, MPH, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: Academic Pediatric Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children, Harris County Medical Society, International Society for the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect, Ray E Helfer Society

Disclosure: Received grant/research funds from Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Integrated Community Systems for CSHCN Grant for other; Received advisory board from Baxter Healthcare Corporation for board membership.

Coauthor(s)

Eileen R Giardino, RN, MSN, PhD FNP-BC, ANP-BC, Associate Professor of Nursing, Department of Family Nursing, University of Texas Health Sciences Center Houston, School of Nursing

Eileen R Giardino, RN, MSN, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American College Health Association, American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children, American Association of Nurse Practitioners, American Nurses Association, International Society for the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Reena Isaac, MD Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine; Forensic Pediatrician, Child Protection Section of Emergency Department, Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston; Staff Physician, Children's Assessment Center, Houston

Reena Isaac, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, Texas Pediatric Society, Ray E Helfer Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Mary L Windle, PharmD Adjunct Associate Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Caroly Pataki, MD Health Sciences Clinical Professor of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine

Caroly Pataki, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, New York Academy of Sciences, Physicians for Social Responsibility

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Chet Johnson, MD Professor of Pediatrics, Associate Director and Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrician, KU Center for Child Health and Development, Shiefelbusch Institute for Life Span Studies; Assistant Dean, Faculty Affairs and Development, University of Kansas School of Medicine

Chet Johnson, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the consistent support and mentorship by Carol D Berkowitz who, despite multiple clinical, teaching, and administrative responsibilities, has found the time to share her considerable expertise and even took the time out of her busy schedule to provide the photographs used to illustrate the physical findings possible when evaluating cases of suspected child sexual abuse. Dr. Berkowitz exemplifies the characteristics of a committed medical educator who is not limited by organizational or geographic boundaries.

References
  1. Adams JA. Evolution of a classification scale: medical evaluation of suspected child sexual abuse. Child Maltreat. 2001 Feb. 6(1):31-6. [Medline].

  2. Adams JA, Kaplan RA, Starling SP, Mehta NH, Finkel MA, Botash AS. Guidelines for medical care of children who may have been sexually abused. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2007 Jun. 20(3):163-72. [Medline].

  3. Adams JA, Kellogg ND, Farst KJ, Harper NS, Palusci VJ, Frasier LD, et al. Updated Guidelines for the Medical Assessment and Care of Children Who May Have Been Sexually Abused. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016 Apr. 29 (2):81-7. [Medline].

  4. Black CM, Driebe EM, Howard LA, Fajman NN, Sawyer MK, Girardet RG, et al. Multicenter study of nucleic acid amplification tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in children being evaluated for sexual abuse. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009 Jul. 28 (7):608-13. [Medline].

  5. Workowski, KA, Berman S., et al. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr5912.pdf. December 10, 2010; Accessed: May 25, 3016.

  6. Gallion HR, Dupree LJ, Scott TA, Arnold DH. Diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis in female children and adolescents evaluated for possible sexual abuse: a comparison of the InPouch TV culture method and wet mount microscopy. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2009 Oct. 22 (5):300-5. [Medline].

  7. Menoch M, Zimmerman S, Garcia-Filion P, Bulloch B. Child abuse education: an objective evaluation of resident and attending physician knowledge. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011 Oct. 27(10):937-40. [Medline].

  8. Finkelhor D, Hotaling GT. Sexual abuse in the National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect: an appraisal. Child Abuse Negl. 1984. 8(1):23-32. [Medline].

  9. Sgroi SM, Blick LC, Porter FS. A conceptual framework for child sexual abuse. Sgroi SM, ed. Handbook of Clinical Intervention in Child Sexual Abuse. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books; 1982. 9-37.

  10. Finkelhor D, Browne A. The traumatic impact of child sexual abuse: a conceptualization. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1985 Oct. 55(4):530-41. [Medline].

  11. Floyed RL, Hirsh DA, Greenbaum VJ, Simon HK. Development of a screening tool for pediatric sexual assault may reduce emergency-department visits. Pediatrics. 2011 Aug. 128(2):221-6. [Medline].

  12. Adams JA. Guidelines for medical care of children evaluated for suspected sexual abuse: an update for 2008. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Oct. 20(5):435-41. [Medline].

  13. Child Maltreatment 2014. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Administration for Children and Families Administration on Children, Youth and Families Children’s Bureau U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Administration for Children and Families Administration on... Available at http://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cb/cm2014.pdf.

  14. Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS-4). US Department of Health and Human Services. Administration for Children and Families. Available at https://www.nis4.org/DOCS/ProjectSummary.pdf.

  15. Sedlak AJ, Broadhurst DD. Third National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect. Final Report NIS-3. US Department of Health and Human Services. 1996.

  16. Finkelhor D, Jones LM, Shattuck A. Updated Trends in Child Maltreatment, 2009. Crimes Against Children Research Center. Crimes Against Children Research Center. Available at http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/Updated_Trends_in_Child_Maltreatment_2009.pdf. Accessed: December 20, 2011.

  17. Jones, L and Finkelhor, D. The Decline in Sexual Abuse Cases. U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs. Available at https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/184741.pdf . 2001; Accessed: May 25, 2016.

  18. Felitti VJ, Anda RF, Nordenberg D, Williamson DF, Spitz AM, Edwards V, et al. Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults. The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. Am J Prev Med. 1998 May. 14(4):245-58. [Medline].

  19. Heger A, Ticson L, Velasquez O, Bernier R. Children referred for possible sexual abuse: medical findings in 2384 children. Child Abuse Negl. 2002 Jun. 26(6-7):645-59. [Medline].

  20. Jenny C, Crawford-Jakubiak JE, Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect, American Academy of Pediatrics. The evaluation of children in the primary care setting when sexual abuse is suspected. Pediatrics. 2013 Aug. 132 (2):e558-67. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  21. Christian CW, Lavelle JM, De Jong AR, et al. Forensic evidence findings in prepubertal victims of sexual assault. Pediatrics. 2000 Jul. 106(1 Pt 1):100-4. [Medline].

  22. Girardet R, Bolton K, Lahoti S, et al. Collection of forensic evidence from pediatric victims of sexual assault. Pediatrics. 2011 Aug. 128(2):233-8. [Medline].

  23. Thackeray JD, Hornor G, Benzinger EA, Scribano PV. Forensic evidence collection and DNA identification in acute child sexual assault. Pediatrics. 2011 Aug. 128(2):227-32. [Medline].

  24. Paolucci EO, Genuis ML, Violato C. A meta-analysis of the published research on the effects of child sexual abuse. J Psychol. 2001 Jan. 135(1):17-36. [Medline].

  25. Janeczko L. A Single Question to Sexually Abused Children Predicts Their Trauma Symptoms. Medscape Medical news. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/823104. Accessed: April 14, 2014.

  26. Melville JD, Kellogg ND, Perez N, Lukefahr JL. Assessment for self-blame and trauma symptoms during the medical evaluation of suspected sexual abuse. Child Abuse Negl. 2014 Mar 10. [Medline].

  27. Laidman J. New guidelines for evaluating suspected child sexual abuse. July 31, 2013; Accessed August 4, 2013. Available at: . Medscape Medical News. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/808730. Accessed: August 7, 2013.

  28. Jenny C, Crawford-Jakubiak JE. The evaluation of children in the primary care setting when sexual abuse is suspected. Pediatrics. 2013 Aug. 132(2):e558-67. [Medline].

  29. Paradise JE, Rostain AL, Nathanson M. Substantiation of sexual abuse charges when parents dispute custody or visitation. Pediatrics. 1988 Jun. 81(6):835-9. [Medline].

  30. Adams JA. Medical evaluation of suspected child sexual abuse. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2004 Jun. 17(3):191-7. [Medline].

  31. Adams JA, Harper K, Knudson S. A proposed system for the classification of anogenital findings in children with suspected sexual abuse. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 1992. 5:73-5.

  32. Adams JA, Harper K, Knudson S, Revilla J. Examination findings in legally confirmed child sexual abuse: it's normal to be normal. Pediatrics. 1994 Sep. 94(3):310-7. [Medline].

  33. Atabaki S, Paradise JE. The medical evaluation of the sexually abused child: lessons from a decade of research. Pediatrics. 1999 Jul. 104(1 Pt 2):178-86. [Medline].

  34. Bays J. Conditions mistaken for child abuse. Reece RM, Ludwig S, eds. Child Abuse: Medical Diagnosis and Management. 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. 287-306.

  35. Bays J, Chadwick D. Medical diagnosis of the sexually abused child. Child Abuse Negl. 1993 Jan-Feb. 17(1):91-110. [Medline].

  36. Bays J, Jenny C. Genital and anal conditions confused with child sexual abuse trauma. Am J Dis Child. 1990 Dec. 144(12):1319-22. [Medline].

  37. Berenson AB. Normal anogenital anatomy. Child Abuse Negl. 1998 Jun. 22(6):589-96; discussion 597-603. [Medline].

  38. Berkowitz CD. Medical consequences of child sexual abuse. Child Abuse Negl. 1998 Jun. 22(6):541-50; discussion 551-4. [Medline].

  39. Briere JN, Elliott DM. Immediate and long-term impacts of child sexual abuse. Future Child. 1994 Summer-Fall. 4(2):54-69. [Medline].

  40. Burgess AW, Groth AN, Holmstrom LL, Sgroi SM. Sexual Assault of Children and Adolescents. New York, NY: Lexington Books; 1978.

  41. CDC. Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5106a1.htm.

  42. Cooper A. Thoracoabdominal trauma. Ludwig S, Kornberg AE, eds. Child Abuse: A Medical Reference. 2nd ed. Churchill Livingstone; 1991. 131-50.

  43. De Jong AR, Rose M. Frequency and significance of physical evidence in legally proven cases of child sexual abuse. Pediatrics. 1989 Dec. 84(6):1022-6. [Medline].

  44. De Jong AR, Rose M. Legal proof of child sexual abuse in the absence of physical evidence. Pediatrics. 1991 Sep. 88(3):506-11. [Medline].

  45. DeLago C, Deblinger E, Schroeder C, Finkel MA. Girls who disclose sexual abuse: urogenital symptoms and signs after genital contact. Pediatrics. 2008 Aug. 122(2):e281-6. [Medline].

  46. Douglas Em, finkelhor D. Child Sexual Abuse Fact Sheet. Crimes against Children Research Laboratory, University of New Hampshire. Available at http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/factsheet/pdf/CSA-FS20.pdf. Accessed: September 2007.

  47. Emans SJ, Goldstein DP. Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. 3rd ed. Boston, MA: Little Brown & Co Inc; 1990.

  48. Feldman W, Feldman E, Goodman JT, et al. Is childhood sexual abuse really increasing in prevalence? An analysis of the evidence. Pediatrics. 1991 Jul. 88(1):29-33. [Medline].

  49. Finkel M. Physical examination. Finkel M, Giardino A, eds. Medical Evaluation of Child Sexual Abuse: A Practical Guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2001. 39-98.

  50. Finkel M. The evaluation. Finkel M, Giardino A, eds. Medical Evaluation of Child Sexual Abuse: A Practical Guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2001. 23-37.

  51. Finkel MA. "I can tell you because you're a doctor". Pediatrics. 2008 Aug. 122(2):442. [Medline].

  52. Finkel MA. Sexual abuse: The medical evaluation. Giardino AG, Alexander R, eds. Child Maltreatment: A Clinical Guide and Reference. St Louis, MO: GW Medical Publishing Inc; 2005. 253-88.

  53. Finkel MA. Technical conduct of the child sexual abuse medical examination. Child Abuse Negl. 1998 Jun. 22(6):555-66. [Medline].

  54. Finkel MA, DeJong AJ. Medical findings in child sexual abuse. Reece RM, Ludwig S, eds. Child Abuse: Medical Diagnosis and Management. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. 207-86.

  55. Finkelhor D. Current information on the scope and nature of child sexual abuse. Future Child. 1994 Summer-Fall. 4(2):31-53. [Medline].

  56. Finkelhor D. Epidemiological factors in the clinical identification of child sexual abuse. Child Abuse Negl. 1993 Jan-Feb. 17(1):67-70. [Medline].

  57. Finkelhor D, et al. A Sourcebook on Child Sexual Abuse. London UK: Sage Publications; 1988.

  58. Finkelhor D, Moore D, Hamby SL, Straus MA. Sexually abused children in a national survey of parents: methodological issues. Child Abuse Negl. 1997 Jan. 21(1):1-9. [Medline].

  59. Finkelhor DH. Child sexual abuse: New Theory and research. New York, NY: Free Press; 1984.

  60. Friedrich WN. Behavioral manifestations of child sexual abuse. Child Abuse Negl. 1998 Jun. 22(6):523-31; discussion 533-9. [Medline].

  61. Gorey KM, Leslie DR. The prevalence of child sexual abuse: integrative review adjustment for potential response and measurement biases. Child Abuse Negl. 1997 Apr. 21(4):391-8. [Medline].

  62. Gushurst CA. Child abuse: behavioral aspects and other associated problems. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2003 Aug. 50(4):919-38. [Medline].

  63. Dubowitz H, DePanfilis D, eds. Handbook for Child Protection Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2000.

  64. Jones LM, Finkelhor D, Halter S. Child maltreatment trends in the 1990s: why does neglect differ from sexual and physical abuse?. Child Maltreat. 2006 May. 11(2):107-20. [Medline].

  65. Kellogg ND, Parra JM, Menard S. Children with anogenital symptoms and signs referred for sexual abuse evaluations. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998 Jul. 152(7):634-41. [Medline].

  66. Kempe CH. Sexual abuse, another hidden pediatric problem: the 1977 C. Anderson Aldrich lecture. Pediatrics. 1978 Sep. 62(3):382-9. [Medline].

  67. Kerns DL, Terman DL, Larson CS. The role of physicians in reporting and evaluating child sexual abuse cases. Future Child. 1994 Summer-Fall. 4(2):119-34. [Medline].

  68. Ladson S, Johnson CF, Doty RE. Do physicians recognize sexual abuse?. Am J Dis Child. 1987 Apr. 141(4):411-5. [Medline].

  69. Larson C, Terman DL, Gomby DS, et al. Sexual abuse of children: recommendations and analysis. Future Child. 1994 Summer-Fall. 4(2):4-30. [Medline].

  70. Lentsch KA, Johnson CF. Do physicians have adequate knowledge of child sexual abuse? The results of two surveys of practicing physicians, 1986 and 1996. Child Maltreat. 2000 Feb. 5(1):72-8. [Medline].

  71. Leventhal JM. Epidemiology of sexual abuse of children: old problems, new directions. Child Abuse Negl. 1998 Jun. 22(6):481-91. [Medline].

  72. Levitt C. Further technical considerations regarding conducting and documenting the child sexual abuse medical examination. Child Abuse Negl. 1998 Jun. 22(6):567-8; discussion 569-71. [Medline].

  73. Ludwig S. Child abuse. Fleisher GR, Ludwig S, eds. Textbook of Pediatric Emergency Medicine. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000.

  74. Marshall WN, Locke C. Statewide survey of physician attitudes to controversies about child abuse. Child Abuse Negl. 1997 Feb. 21(2):171-9. [Medline].

  75. McCann J, Voris J, Simon M. Genital injuries resulting from sexual abuse: a longitudinal study. Pediatrics. 1992 Feb. 89(2):307-17. [Medline].

  76. Muram D. Child sexual abuse: relationship between sexual acts and genital findings. Child Abuse Negl. 1989. 13(2):211-6. [Medline].

  77. Myers JE. Adjudication of child sexual abuse cases. Future Child. 1994 Summer-Fall. 4(2):84-101. [Medline].

  78. Myers JE. Legal Issues in Child Abuse and Neglect Practice (Interpersonal Violence). 2nd ed. SAGE Publications; 1998.

  79. Myers JE. Expert testimony. Briere J, Berliner L, Buckley JA, et al, eds. The APSAC Handbook on Child Maltreatment. Sage Publications; 1996. 319-40.

  80. Nadal FM, Giardino AP. Differential diagnosis: conditions that mimic child maltreatment. Giardino ER, Giardino AP. Nursing Approach to the Evaluation of Child Maltreatment. St. Louis, MO: GW Medical Publishing; 2003. 215-50.

  81. Nicholson EB, Bulkley J. Sexual Abuse Allegations in Custody and Visitation Cases: A Resource Book for Judges and Court Personnel. Washington, DC: American Bar Association; 1988.

  82. Pence DM, Wilson CA. Reporting and investigating child sexual abuse. Future Child. 1994 Summer-Fall. 4(2):70-83. [Medline].

  83. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. The Physical Signs of Child Sexual Abuse. An Evidence-Based Review and Guidance for Best Practice. 2008.

  84. Russell DE. The incidence and prevalence of intrafamilial and extrafamilial sexual abuse of female children. Child Abuse Negl. 1983. 7(2):133-46. [Medline].

  85. Sgroi SM. Sexual molestation of children. The last frontier in child abuse. Child Today. 1975 May-Jun. 4(3):18-21, 44. [Medline].

  86. Swanston HY, Tebbutt JS, O'Toole BI, Oates RK. Sexually abused children 5 years after presentation: a case-control study. Pediatrics. 1997 Oct. 100(4):600-8. [Medline].

  87. US Dept of Health and Human Services. Child Maltreatment 2002: Summary of Key Findings. 2004.

 
Previous
Next
 
Possible factors influencing the decline in substantiated cases of child sexual abuse. Courtesy of David Finkelhor, PhD.
Adverse Childhood Experience (ACE) Pyramid.
Infant girl in frog-leg supine position. Genital examination reveals translucent hymenal membrane with significant redundant tissue making hymenal orifice difficult to appreciate in this photo. With further traction applied to both labia majora, the hymenal orifice could be observed. Courtesy of Carol D. Berkowitz, MD.
Infant girl in frog-leg supine position. Hymenal orifice is crescentic (little time is present at 12-o'clock posterior). Hymen is thin and translucent with vessels visible. Hymenal edge is regular and without interruption. Courtesy of Carol D. Berkowitz, MD.
Girl in knee-chest position. Hymenal orifice is crescentic, thin, translucent, and without interruption or scarring. Courtesy of Carol D. Berkowitz, MD.
Infant girl in frog-leg supine position. Hymenal orifice is annular, with tissue present around entire opening. Some redundancy is present. Courtesy of Carol D. Berkowitz, MD.
Infant girl in frog-leg supine position. Hymenal orifice is annular with a "bump" at 1-o'clock position and a small "notch" at 10-o'clock position. Hymenal membrane is thin and translucent, with no interruption or scarring. Courtesy of Carol D. Berkowitz, MD.
Girl in frog-leg supine position, exhibiting annular hymenal orifice. Tissue is thin and translucent without disruption or scarring. Courtesy of Carol D. Berkowitz, MD.
Girl in frog-leg supine position exhibiting hymenal orifice, which is crescentic and has symmetric attenuation at lateral margins. No scarring is present. Courtesy of Carol D. Berkowitz, MD.
Girl in frog-leg supine position exhibiting hymen. Hymen is septate; a band of tissue crosses the hymenal orifice. Tissue is thin with no scarring present. Courtesy of Carol D. Berkowitz, MD.
Adolescent girl in supine position demonstrating estrogenized tissue. Hymen is thicker, pink, and fairly opaque with no vessels visible. Tissue is redundant. Courtesy of Carol D. Berkowitz, MD.
Genital examination of adolescent girl revealing estrogenized hymenal tissue that is pink, thick, and opaque. Orifice appears irregular, secondary to significant redundancy of tissue. Courtesy of Carol D. Berkowitz, MD.
Genital examination of adolescent girl demonstrating estrogenized hymenal tissue that is pink, thick, and opaque. Orifice is irregular due to areas of redundancy, especially at the 9-o'clock position. Courtesy of Carol D. Berkowitz, MD.
Prepubertal girl with foul-smelling bloody discharge. On examination, a foreign body in the vagina was found just past the hymenal orifice. The foreign body is lodged in vagina and appears to be toilet tissue that is colonized with bacteria, causing a vulvovaginitis. The foreign body was dislodged with gentle water flushing during examination. Courtesy of Carol D. Berkowitz, MD.
Genital examination of prepubertal girl with foul-smelling bloody discharge. On examination, a foreign body in the vagina was found lodged just past the hymenal orifice and appears to be toilet tissue that is colonized with bacteria, causing a vulvovaginitis. The foreign body was dislodged with gentle water flushing during examination. Courtesy of Carol D. Berkowitz, MD.
Infant girl with imperforate hymen and absence of a hymenal orifice. Courtesy of Carol D. Berkowitz, MD.
Genital examination of girl revealing bruising on medial aspects of labia minora, hymenal trauma with disruption of hymenal tissue, and fresh blood. Courtesy of Carol D. Berkowitz, MD.
Infant girl with significant bruising that involved labia minora and labia majora, hymenal trauma with disruption of hymen, and fresh blood. Courtesy of Carol D. Berkowitz, MD.
Genital examination 10 days after infant girl presented with significant bruising that involved labia minora and labia majora, hymenal trauma with disruption of hymen, and fresh blood. Bruising on vulvar structure is nearly resolved. Hymen is healing and no blood is observed. Courtesy of Carol D. Berkowitz, MD.
Genital examination of girl in frog-leg supine position after genital trauma. Examination reveals suture in place at 6-o'clock position to stop bleeding from injury. Hymenal edge is irregular and asymmetric. Courtesy of Carol D. Berkowitz, MD.
US Maltreatment Trends, 1990-2013. Courtesy of David Finkelhor, PhD.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.