Oropharyngeal assessment used for predicting difficulty in laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation
The original Mallampati classification was derived by Mallampati et al. in 1985 to predict which patients would have difficult laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation based on an objective anatomical assessment. Initially three designated categories existed, however a fourth stratification was added by Samsoon et al. in 1987 and remains the current classification to date.
The assessment is done with the patient seated upright with their mouth open and tongue protruded, and the examiner looks to see what structures of the oropharynx can be visualized. The less obstructed these structures are, the lower the Mallampati score. Lower scores (1 and 2) are associated with favourable airway management whereas higher scores (3 and 4) portend elevated risk of more challenging intubation.
A large systematic review by Lee et al. in 2006 of pooled studies examining the utility of the modified Mallampati score found that while it is predictive of difficult laryngoscopy and intubation, it should not be used in isolation but rather as part of a global patient assessment. To date the modified Mallampati score is used as part of most airway assessments.
Mallampati SR, Gatt SP, Gugino LD, Desai SP, Waraksa B, Freiberger D, Liu PL.
Samsoon GL, Young JR.
Lee A, Fan LT, Gin T, Karmakar MK, Ngan Kee WD.
The original Mallampati classification was derived by Mallampati et al. in 1985 to predict which patients would have difficult laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation based on an objective anatomical assessment. Initially three designated categories existed, however a fourth stratification was added by Samsoon et al. in 1987 and remains the current classification to date.
The assessment is done with the patient seated upright with their mouth open and tongue protruded, and the examiner looks to see what structures of the oropharynx can be visualized. The less obstructed these structures are, the lower the Mallampati score. Lower scores (1 and 2) are associated with favourable airway management whereas higher scores (3 and 4) portend elevated risk of more challenging intubation.
A large systematic review by Lee et al. in 2006 of pooled studies examining the utility of the modified Mallampati score found that while it is predictive of difficult laryngoscopy and intubation, it should not be used in isolation but rather as part of a global patient assessment. To date the modified Mallampati score is used as part of most airway assessments.
Mallampati SR, Gatt SP, Gugino LD, Desai SP, Waraksa B, Freiberger D, Liu PL.
Samsoon GL, Young JR.
Lee A, Fan LT, Gin T, Karmakar MK, Ngan Kee WD.
© 2020 QxMD Software Inc., all rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any way without express written consent of QxMD. This information should not be used for the diagnosis or treatment of any health problem or disease. This information is not intended to replace clinical judgment or guide individual patient care in any manner. Click here for full notice and disclaimer.
